taekwondoWTFmaster1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Serkan Yilmaz so had to win this fight it's bullshit the k1 cheated him out of all his fights poor serkan yilmaz the only way he could win was by knockout.Now I know he quit k1.If it wasn't for the pathetic judges Serkan Yilmaz record should be 6-0-0 undefeated.

TapMeOut (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

lol@more hits.. the only thing Serkan Yilmaz hit was air molecules. He had no answer for ALL of masato's low kicks and punches... he ate every single one.

hudizhoutube (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Why Masato won?It's not fair!Serkan had more hits!

kermetik (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

masato have hard low kicks ...no chance for the turky guy ...

AzeriSelcuk (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

great soinning kicks from yilmaz, he was vey resereved , shame

Yigit27vcity (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Serkan Yilmaz are more Better than Masato i think...

lilzekedanbae (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Dude i'm not saying oh you should judge a fight based on martial arts. For example a kick to the head deserves more points then a kick to the leg. Also a knock down deserves a win for the round. But here Yilmaz is going against a defending Japanese K-1 fighter. Obviously the match is leaning towards Masato. He should have won solely on the fact that he took Masato down at 3:45.

j0tt0 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

that spining kicks are unstoppable

mikidu20 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

niktamer tu ser pas te batre serkan apa

redblazerpea (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

i dunno. a scot is short for saying a scotsman. spaniard for spanish. i dont see the difference but give me your opinion. thanks