carminaburana13 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

hmmm...a bit too passionate...but still good. I guess Ravel left plenty of room for interpretation.

mpantel88 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

non capisco questa fretta... ma neanche certi acenti che si danno su quel pezzo...

KaranEtemadzadeh (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Ok. 1 point for the Irish idiot.

ownage1810 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

No. I just don't really enjoy bombast.

shineshocker (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

You must be another one of those Irish idiots I've offended, greetings !

luminoceanne (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

oups ! I find sometimes the accents a little destabilizing compare to what we are use to hear !! hihi ! but very nice " envolées" ...the sound of the piano is a little funny ! I guess also because of the old recording ! but there is character here, I'm a little " étourdie" dizzy? !!!

thepacers (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

i think perlemuters 1955 recordings are the greatest. still, this one is mabe very fast but for me also very coniencing.different but still very enjoyable. thats why i give it 5 stars too.

scottturner1994 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I didn't like it.Listen to Argerich's recording. This is supposed to sound like water.

maatthieu15 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

i also listened this piece by others pianists. For Jeux d'eau, Robert Schmitz did the best interpretation.

ibclappin (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

maybe i'm an idiot; but after listening to this piece performed by 6 different great pianists, very many times each, and enjoying it every single time, to me this performance does not ruin any phrases and delivers them with masterful technique and a, should i say, 'expected' deliverance, as if from a dream about the perfect performance of this historical piece.